"The ceramics teacher announced on opening day that he was dividing the class into two groups. All those on the left side of the studio, he said, would be graded solely on the quantity of work they produced, all those on the right solely on its quality. His procedure was simple: on the final day of class he would bring in his bathroom scales and weigh the work of the "quantity" group: fifty pounds of pots rated an "A", forty pounds a "B", and so on. Those being graded on "quality," however, needed to produce only one pot -- albeit a perfect one -- to get an "A". Well, came grading time and a curious fact emerged: the works of highest quality were all produced by the group being graded for quantity. It seems that while the "quantity" group was busily churning out piles of work -- and learning from their mistakes -- the "quality" group had sat theorizing about perfection, and in the end had little more to show for their efforts than grandiose theories and a pile of dead clay."

(From the lovely, "Art & Fear" by David Bayles and Ted Orland)

This is my favorite phenomenon. It requires a fundamental shift in mindset towards the process of generating ideas: as an ability that deserves regular practice, rather than an event that elicits episodic engagement.

What struck me about the story, aside from the main point, is that folks' outcomes were largely determined by what group they were assigned. And it made me think: why not self-assign? In the window of new year's resolutions, why not resolve to join the quantity group?

Click here to subscribe to Paint & Pipette, the weekly digest of these daily posts.