Meander
The trouble with innovation work is, it’s so messy.
Why is this a problem?
We crave efficiency. We want progress to map to time spent (ie when 50% of the time has passed, we ought to be 50% of the way done with the task). We want everything to be packaged up all nice and neat.
But the creative process is rarely nice and neat.
It is, as folks like to say, “non-linear.”
The thing about non-linearity is that it defies explanation. I was interviewed by a reporter asked about my own creative process. Apart from my personal vendetta against hypocrisy — which is to say, for any tool I advocate but don’t use, I have a simple rule: either start doing it, or stop teaching it — I said I hardly understand it myself. And I don’t think that’s a bad thing.
It’s only a bad thing when your job is to explain. (Which mine sometimes is.)
A classic example is what we’ve inadvertently done to “the design process” via the workshop format. Design mastery in three easy days! As impossible as that is, you’d be amazed to learn how many people wish it took less time than that.
(Imagine taking that attitude towards swimming, or piano, or painting, or any other skill you’re developing…)
The truth is, the creative process that underlies innovation efforts takes time. It’s not efficient. Sometimes you need to daydream (we call that “synthesis”), sometimes you have to circle back (we call that “iterating”), sometimes you need to start over (we call that “pivoting”). Sometimes, the people we’re trying to design for just need space. Sometimes you need to wander. But none of those things lend themselves to a workshop format.
There’s no time to take time!
So what do we do? We chop the messy parts out — because, after all, who wants to come to Stanford and go on a “daydreaming mission” — and we’re left with a perfectly straightforward sequence of events, which, while explicable, rarely yields the outcomes students hope for, in the manner they expect.
While awkwardly carrying my coffee onto campus today, I remembered an old activity we used to do with students: we looked at a photo and imagined various interpretations of a person awkwardly carrying a coffee down a busy street.
“I loved that activity,” I thought. “Why don’t we do it anymore?” I wondered.
“Because we don’t have time,” I realized sadly.
I’d like to suggest — to myself, if no one else! — that we make time to be inefficient. Meander a bit.
It’s the only way we’ll ever surprise ourselves.
Related: Wander
Related: Treasure The Mess
Related: Practice What You Preach
Related: Don’t Be Efficient
Related: Disciplined Daydreaming
Related: Seek Random Inputs
Join over 21,147 creators & leaders who read Paint & Pipette each week
The quality of our thinking is deeply influenced by the diversity of the inputs we collect. Implementing practices like Brian Grazer’s “Curiosity Conversations” ensures innovators are well-equipped with a variety of high-quality raw material for problem-solving.