When You’re Stuck, Stall
In her uproarious memoir, Bossypants, Tina Fey describes one of the most pivotal decisions in her career (whether she’d portray an upstart Vice Presidential candidate from Alaska on Saturday Night Live) thus:
“We decided not to decide. This is another technique I learned from Lorne. Sometimes if you have a difficult decision to make, just stall until the answer presents itself.”
Sounds a lot like Frank Lloyd Wright, doesn’t it? As spy-turned-researcher Donald MacKinnon illuminated in his landmark study of practical creativity, often what distinguishes “the greats” from the rest is a willingness to not decide, yet. Answers have a tendency to “present themselves” to folks who delay decisions, especially to the ones who expect good ideas to keep coming.
The key, however, is to actually care about the solution. If you don’t care, you’re just procrastinating; delaying a decision when you care about the outcome, however, is totally different: it’s a productive strategy to court serendipity.
Related: Delay Decisions
Related: Expect Good Ideas to Come Late
Related: Drive Innovation Through Care
Click here to subscribe to Paint & Pipette, the weekly digest of these daily posts.
Learning to work with AI isn’t really a technical challenge. It’s a human behavior change effort. AI skill building is about far more than learning new tools. It’s about unlearning old ways of working.
AI is transforming industries. Designers are compressing month-long workflows into minutes. Scientists are using AI to condense years of research into days. But what about decades into minutes? Meet Adam. He doesn’t have a LinkedIn account. But in 45 minutes, he built an AI tool that'll save his organization thousands of days of work every year.
Growth mindset expert Diane Flynn shares insights and advice for a more experienced generation of workers who might feel somewhat hesitant to embrace the collaborative superpowers of GenAI.
Right now, in boardrooms and Slack channels across the globe, leaders are inadvertently creating a culture of AI shame. They're reinforcing the very hesitation they should be helping their teams overcome. It's time for an intervention.
The quality of our thinking is deeply influenced by the diversity of the inputs we collect. Implementing practices like Brian Grazer’s “Curiosity Conversations” ensures innovators are well-equipped with a variety of high-quality raw material for problem-solving.
The first question an innovator must answer is not “can I make it?” but rather, “should I?” This has become something of a mantra among CEOs I work with, as a needful protection against the gravitational pull of the organizational bureaucracy.
One of the defining contributions the d.school is helping teams ask themselves, “What kind of thinking is appropriate, when?” We call such clarity being “Mindful of Process.” And it can seem like semantics until you realize we need to show up in different ways.
You’re probably getting fat on AI content: bingeing podcasts, hoarding newsletter tips, saving Twitter threads... While it feels productive, all that consumption is just giving you a knowledge sugar high. And like any sugar high, it’ll crash—leaving you with exactly zero new capabilities.
The most inventive folks I’ve studied are disciplined about seeking inspiration. If you don’t make time to get out of the box, you will not be able to think out of the box, either. It’s not that complicated, but it requires you obliterate clean compartmentalization in favor of messy meandering.
There’s only one right answer to the question, “Did AI help with this?” The shift to an AI-first mindset isn't just about saving time. It's about recognizing a fundamental truth: AI isn't a tool you might want to use. It's an amplifier you'd be reckless not to use.