Normalize Growth
Last week, I gave a guest lecture for a Product Management class at Stanford. As a coda, I exhorted them to aspire to a life of continuous learning. By way of example, I mentioned that, “80% of the stuff I just shared with you, I didn’t know 2 years ago.”
You could have heard a pin drop.
“Really?” One student muttered disbelievingly. “Whoa.”
Why the surprise? They mistakenly assumed that, while they’re certainly supposed to be learning, yet at some point, surely at some point — ostensibly, by the time you become a “successful teacher” like the guy standing in front of them — you don’t need to grow anymore.
What a shame that the assumption was that I had always known the things I was sharing with them. The corollary is, of course, that they could never really know them. You know, because they didn’t know them from birth, as I must have.
The logic is laughable as soon as you process the implications.
But here’s the thing: most people don’t. Most people don’t think about how much work goes into preparing for a talk, or to say it in reverse, how if they work hard in a particular direction, within a couple of years, they’ll be able to speak knowledgably about a subject!
I thought my main topic was creativity & innovation. But it was bigger that than that. The class session was an opportunity to make continuous learning — and thus continuous growth — the normal expected trajectory of life. But to really appreciate it, they had to see it even in me: different from what I was 2 years ago.
You know what they realized? They can be in a radically different place in 2 years, too!
Related: Practice What You Preach
Related: Legitimize Learning
Click here to subscribe to Paint & Pipette, the weekly digest of these daily posts.
The quality of our thinking is deeply influenced by the diversity of the inputs we collect. Implementing practices like Brian Grazer’s “Curiosity Conversations” ensures innovators are well-equipped with a variety of high-quality raw material for problem-solving.