Reject the Tyranny of Efficiency
One of the great challenges on this journey to creative mastery is that the “rules” of creative genius fly in the face of the normal, smart thing to do. I should know, as a recovering spreadsheet junkie, type-A, straight-A kind of guy…
I thought this tension was exemplified beautifully in an old Seinfeld interview with Harvard Business Review:
“You and Larry David wrote Seinfeld together, without a traditional writers’ room, and burnout was one reason you stopped. Was there a more sustainable way to do it? Could McKinsey or someone have helped you find a better model?
Who’s McKinsey?
It’s a consulting firm.
Are they funny?
No.
Then I don’t need them. If you’re efficient, you’re doing it the wrong way.”
So much of creative work doesn’t feel efficient. I can’t imagine how Frank Lloyd Wright’s associates felt while he dawdled under the Fallingwater deadline. That couldn’t have felt great. Not to mention how Claude Shannon’s colleagues at Bell Labs must have felt watching him juggle down the hallway…
As Amos Tversky quipped, “You waste years by not being able to waste hours,” and yet, wasting hours feels so… inefficient. The key is to know when to waste time — when wasting time is actually productive.
Instead of seeking efficiency, the real breakthrough thinkers are looking for the most effective ways to unlock problems.
Related: Imitate Frank Lloyd Wright
Related: Claude Shannon
Related: Divergent Diversions
Related: Permission To Seek A Diversion
Related: Don’t Be Efficient
Join over 11,147 creators & leaders who read Paint & Pipette each week
The quality of our thinking is deeply influenced by the diversity of the inputs we collect. Implementing practices like Brian Grazer’s “Curiosity Conversations” ensures innovators are well-equipped with a variety of high-quality raw material for problem-solving.